Civil Society Advocacy Strategy In Urging Cancellation Of Corruption Eradication Commission Regulation Revision
Strategi Advokasi Masyarakat Sipil dalam Mendesak Pembatalan Revisi Regulasi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi
Abstract
This study aims to describe the strategy of civil society movements that are members of the anti-corruption civil society coalition. This study uses the advocacy theory of Sheldon Gen and Amy Conley Wright. The research method used is qualitative with primary data sources from interviews, and secondary data processing from various literatures relevant to this research. The anti-corruption civil society coalition controls state power by demanding that the government and the DPR be accountable to the law and the public by supporting the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) by not weakening the KPK institutions, and increasing public awareness of important public issues through advocacy, in this case the discourse on the Law. KPK which was revised by the DPR. In 2019 the momentum for the revision of the KPK Law was successfully carried out by the DPR together with the Government so that the advocacy carried out by the coalition failed. The anti-corruption civil society coalition adopts an advocacy strategy by strengthening a large coalition, lobbying policy makers, conducting academic studies, and labeling, media reporting, and involving and mobilizing the public in carrying out movements. Of the five advocacy strategies, in the end, it has strengths and weaknesses to carry out a social movement in influencing the policy on the revision of the KPK Law, but in the end the advocacy strategy carried out by the anti-corruption civil society coalition failed to influence policy makers and in 2019, the Law The KPK was revised on 17 September 2019.
Downloads
References
Benford, R. D. & Snow, D. A.. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assesment. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 26, 611-639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage Publication.
Faisal, S. (2010). Format-Format Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Gen, S., & Wright, A. C. (2013). Policy Advocacy Organizations: A Framework Linking Theory and Practice. (Journal of Policy Practice, Vol. 12 No.3., h. 18-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2013.795477
McAdam, D. & Snow. (1997). Social Movements:Readings on Their Emergence, Mobilization, and Dynamics. Roxbury Pub.
Nailufar, N. N. (2019). "KPK Fana, Korupsi Abadi (3): Apakah Kita sedang Berjalan Mundur?" https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2019/10/17/160000165/kpk-fana-korupsi-abadi-3-apakah-kita-sedang-berjalan-mundur?page=all
Permata, A. G. (2017). Peran Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW) dalam Melakukan Advokasi Untuk Mencegah Revisi Undang- Undang No. 30 Tahun 2002. FISIP Universitas Indonesia.
Fahmilda, Y., & Prastiyono, Y. A. (2019). Representasi, Parodisasi, Dan Kontekstualisasi Tujuh Puluhan Karya Yanusa Nugroho: Pendekatan Posmodernisme Linda Hutcheon. Seminar Internasional Riksa Bahasa. http://proceedings.upi.edu/index.php/riksabahasa/article/view/1112
Ramadhana, K. & Oktaryal, A. (2020) Laporan Tim Advokasi Koalisi Masyarakat Sipil Antikorupsi.
Rastika, I. (2019, September 17). Jalan Panjang Revisi UU KPK, Ditolak Berkali-kali hingga Disahkan Halaman all - Kompas.com. KOMPAS.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/09/17/16171491/jalan-panjang-revisi-uu-kpk-ditolak-berkali-kali-hingga-disahkan?page=all
Ridwan, R. (2012). Peran Lembaga Pendidikan dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(3), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.126
Sarwono, J. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Widjajanto, B. & Hadjar, A. F. (2020) Reformasi di Korupsi KPK dihabisi, Sebuah Catatan Kritis”. Intrans, Malang.
Copyright (c) 2021 Mohammad Ezha Fachriza Roshady, Sri Budi Eko Wardhani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Atribusi-Non Commercial-Share Alike (CC BY-NC-SA).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
