Cultural Contestation and State Responses to LGBT Acceptance: A Comparison Between Indonesia and European Models of Inclusiveness

Kontestasi Budaya Dan Respons Negara terhadap Penerimaan LGBT: Perbandingan Antara Indonesia Dan Model Inklusivitas Di Eropa

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dynamics of LGBT acceptance in Indonesia in comparison with inclusive models in several European countries, such as Sweden and Germany. Using a constructivist and human rights theory approach, this research explores how cultural norms, religious values, and social constructions influence public perception and state policies regarding LGBT rights. Constructivist theory is used to examine how Indonesia's cultural identity and social norms, heavily influenced by religious values such as Islam, lead to conservative societal attitudes and policies towards LGBT rights. In contrast, secular European countries reflect different social constructions, with more open and inclusive norms. Human rights theory serves as a framework to evaluate the policy approach differences between Indonesia and Europe regarding LGBT rights, especially in implementing principles of equality and non-discrimination. In Indonesia, there is a tension between international human rights principles and local cultural norms, leading to resistance toward LGBT rights recognition. Meanwhile, European countries tend to adopt human rights standards as the foundation for inclusive policies that provide stronger legal protections for the LGBT community. This research uses a qualitative method with secondary data analysis of literature reviews, government policy documents, reports from international human rights organizations, and academic journal articles on LGBT rights in both Indonesia and Europe. The findings reveal that social constructions and cultural identities in Indonesia play a significant role in shaping state policies that tend to uphold traditional values, whereas inclusivity models in European countries are driven by a recognition of universal rights and equality principles. This study emphasizes the importance of understanding cultural and social factors in public policies related to LGBT rights," a more specific concluding statement might be: "This study calls for an approach that integrates cultural and social contexts with international human rights standards to promote inclusive policies for LGBT rights in Indonesia

Keywords: Europe, Human Rights, Indonesia, LGBT, State Policy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sritami Santi Hatmini, Universitas Slamet Riyadi Sukarta

The author graduated in 2012 with a Master's degree in Political Science from Universitas Gadjah Mada. Currently, he is a lecturer in the International Relations Studies Program at Universitas Slamet Riyadi Surakarta.

Agung Yudhistira Nugroho, Universitas Slamet Riyadi Surakarta

The author graduated in 2014 with a Master's degree in International Relations from Universitas Gadjah Mada. Currently, he is a lecturer in the International Relations Studies Program at Universitas Slamet Riyadi Surakarta.

References

Amnesty International. (2021). Amnesty International Report 2020/21: The State of the World’s Human Rights. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol10/3202/2021/en/.

Blackwood, E. (2010). Falling into the Lesbi World: Desire and Difference in Indonesia. University of Hawaii Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wqj73

Boellstorff, T. (2005). The Gay Archipelago. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hhq1f

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/qrj0902027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology; In Qualittaive Research in Psychology 3 (2). Pp. 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Corrales, J. (2022). The Politics of LGBTQ Rights Expansion in Latin America and the Caribbean. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993609

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design. SAGE Publications.

Crouch, M. (2014). Sexuality, Religion, and the State in Indonesia: Multiple Regulatory Standards. Asian Studies Review, 38(2), 161–175. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20460931

Donnelly, J. (2013). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice, 3rd edition. Cornell University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt1xx5q2

Donnelly, J., & Whelan, D. J. (2020). International Human Rights (6th ed.) (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429266072

Encarnación, O. G. (2016). Out in the Periphery: Latin America’s Gay Rights Revolution. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199356645.001.0001

European Commission. (2019). Standard Eurobarometer 91: Public Opinion in the European Union. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2253.

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2020). A Long Way To Go For LGBTI Equality. https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2020/eu-lgbti-survey-results

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2020). LGBTI Survey Data Explorer. https://fra.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/data-and-maps/2020/lgbti-survey-data-explorer

Human Rights Watch. (2013). In Religion’s Name: Abuses against Religious Minorities in Indonesia. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/indonesia0213_ForUpload_0.pdf

Human Rights Watch. (2016). These Political Games Ruin Our Lives: Indonesia’s LGBT Community Under Threat. In Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/report/2016/08/10/these-political-games-ruin-our-lives/indonesias-lgbt-community-under-threat

Kollman, K. (2013). The same-sex unions revolution in Western democracies. In International norms and domestic policy change. Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.7765/9781526112217

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. T. A.-T. T.-. (2016). Qualitative research : a guide to design and implementation (Fourth edition NV-1 online resource (xix, 346 pages) : illustrations). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/ LK - https://worldcat.org/title/904400178

Pew Research Center (2019) The Global Divide on Homosexuality Persists. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/06/25/global-divide-on-homosexuality-persists.

Sharp, C. A. (2003). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). In Evaluation Journal of Australasia (Vol. 3, Issue 2). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X0300300213

Swift, A. (2022). Being Creative with Resources in Qualitative Research. In SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (pp. 290–306). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770278.n19

Takács, J. (2006). Social exclusion of young lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people in Europe. The European Region of the International Lesbian and Gay Association, January 2006, 37–72. https://ilga-europe.org/sites/default/files/Attachments/social_exclusion_of_young_lesbian_gay_bisexual_and_transgender_people_lgbt_in_europe_april_2006.pdf

Weiss, M. L., & Bosia, M. J. (2013). Global Homophobia: States, Movements, and the Politics of Oppression (M. L. Weiss & M. J. Bosia (eds.)). University of Illinois Press. https://doi.org/10.5406/illinois/9780252037726.001.0001

Wendt, A. (2005). Four sociologies of international politics. Perspectives on World Politics: Third Edition, 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511612183.002.

How to Cite
Hatmini, S., & Nugroho, A. (2025). Cultural Contestation and State Responses to LGBT Acceptance: A Comparison Between Indonesia and European Models of Inclusiveness. Journal of Political Issues, 6(2), 146-155. https://doi.org/10.33019/jpi.v6i2.301
Published
2025-01-31