Evaluating Indonesia's National Defense Policy in Shaping an Effective Area Denial Strategy
Evaluasi Kebijakan Pertahanan Negara Indonesia dalam Membangun Efektifitas Strategi Penangkalan Wilayah.
Abstract
This research delves into the analysis of Indonesia's national defense policy and its influence on the development of area denial strategies, with a focus on maritime security. The background highlights the importance of understanding the evolution of Indonesia's defense policy and its implications for regional security dynamics. The aim is to examine the alignment between Indonesia's defense policy objectives and the formulation of area denial strategies, utilizing qualitative research methods with secondary data. Using Creswell's guidelines for qualitative research design, this study carefully looks at existing literature, policy documents, and historical records to look into three main areas: how Indonesia's national defense policy has changed over time, what its main area denial strategies are, and how defense policy has affected the creation of these strategies. Findings reveal a shift in Indonesia's defense posture towards a more maritime-centric approach, with investments in maritime defense systems, A2/AD measures, and asymmetric tactics. Moreover, the analysis demonstrates a significant alignment between Indonesia's defense policy objectives and the development of area denial strategies, highlighting the country's commitment to safeguarding its territorial sovereignty and maritime interests. The conclusion underscores the importance of a holistic understanding of Indonesia's defense policy for enhancing regional security and stability.
Downloads
References
Andrews, D. J., Pennetti, C. A., Collier, Z. A., Polmateer, T. L., & Lambert, J. H. (2020). Systems evaluation for defense operations of maritime transport. 2020 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon), 714–720. https://doi.org/10.1109/syscon47679.2020.9275887
Anwar, D. F. (2020). Indonesia and the ASEAN outlook on the Indo-Pacific. International Affairs, 96(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz223
Arayesh, M. B., Golmohammadi, E., Nekooeezadeh, M., & Mansouri, A. (2017). The effects of organizational culture on the development of strategic thinking at the organizational level. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6, 261–275. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2017.60385
Arif, M., & Kurniawan, Y. (2018). Strategic culture and Indonesian maritime security. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 5(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.203
Bethel, S. R. (2016). Sustainment in an Anti-Access/Area-Denial Environment. Army Sustainment, 48, 12–16.
Bonds, T., Predd, J. B., Heath, T. R., Chase, M. S., Johnson, M., Lostumbo, M. J., Bonomo, J., Mane, M., & Steinberg, P. S. (2017). What Role Can Land-Based, Multi-Domain Anti-Access/Area Denial Forces Play in Deterring or Defeating Aggression? Rand Corporation Santa Monica United States. https://doi.org/10.7249/rr1820
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Emmers, R. (2014). Indonesia’s role in ASEAN: A case of incomplete and sectorial leadership. The Pacific Review, 27(4), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.924230
Gindarsah, I. (2015). Indonesia’s defence diplomacy: Harnessing the hedging strategy against regional uncertainties. https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/wp293/
Gindarsah, I. (2016). Strategic hedging in Indonesia’s defense diplomacy. Defense & Security Analysis, 32(4), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2016.1233695
Hagen, J., Morgan, F. E., Heim, J. L., & Carroll, M. (2016). The Foundations of Operational Resilience—Assessing the Ability to Operate in an Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) Environment. The Analytical Framework, Lexicon, and Characteristics of the Operational Resilience Analysis Model (ORAM). https://doi.org/10.7249/rr1265
Johnson, J. (2017). Washington’s perceptions and misperceptions of Beijing’s anti-access area-denial (A2-AD)‘strategy’: implications for military escalation control and strategic stability. The Pacific Review, 30(3), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1239129
Laksmana, E. A. (2011). Climate Insecurities in Indonesia: Implications and Challenges for Defence Transformation. Asia Security Initiative Policy Series, Working Paper, 16. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3236461
Laksmana, E. A. (2020). Indonesia and Anti-Access Warfare: Preliminary Policy Thoughts. The Indonesian Quarterly, 48(4), 303–321. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799725
Lockyer, A., & Cohen, M. D. (2017). Denial strategy in Australian strategic thought. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(4), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2017.1278743
Mardhani, D., Runturambi, A. J. S., & Hanita, M. (2020). Security And Defense In National Resilience Studies To Realize A National Security System. Jurnal Pertahanan Dan Bela Negara, 10(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.33172/jpbh.v10i3.1112
Mastro, O. (2014). China’s anti-access-area denial (A2/AD) capabilities: is American rebalancing enough? China’s Antiaccess-Area Denial (A2/AD) Capabilities: Is the US Rebalancing Enough, 118–140. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3008893
Mols, S. (2016). China’s Anti-Access/Area Denial Strategy in the South China Sea. Asian Security, 12(3), 205–224.
Morada, N. M. (2010). The ASEAN Regional Forum: origins and evolution. In Cooperative Security in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 29–51). Routledge.
Nichols, R. K., Mumm, H., Lonstein, W. D., Ryan, J. J. C. H., Carter, C. M., Hood, J.-P., Shay, J. S., Mai, R. W., & Jackson, M. J. (2020). Unmanned vehicle systems & operations on air, sea, land. New Prairie Press.
Ochmanek, D. (2015). Sustaining US Leadership in the Asia-Pacific Region: Why a Strategy of Direct Defense Against Antiaccess and Area Denial Threats Is Desirable and Feasible. Rand Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE142.html
Praditya, E., Suprapto, F. A., Ali, Y., Surjaatmadja, S., & Duarte, R. (2023). Nusantara Capital City (IKN): Threats and Defense Strategies for Indonesia’s New Capital. The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning, 4(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.46456/jisdep.v4i1.420
Sarjito, A. (2022). Perang Hibrida: Perang Generasi Keempat. Manajemen Pertahanan: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Manajemen Pertahanan, 8(1).
Sarjito, I. A., Duarte, E. P., & Sos, S. (2023). Geopolitik dan Geostrategi Pertahanan: Tantangan Keamanan Global. Indonesia Emas Group.
Sukma, R. (2018). Indonesia’s Defense Policy: From Territorial Defense to Maritime Fulcrum. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Syailendra, E. A. (2017). A nonbalancing act: Explaining Indonesia’s failure to balance against the Chinese threat. Asian Security, 13(3), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2017.1365489
Tatara, B. A., Suhirwan, S., & Afifuddin, M. (2022). The active defense strategy of the National Narcotics Board of the Republic of Indonesia in facing asymmetric warfare. International Journal of Advances in Social and Economics, 4(3), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijase.v4i3.226
Vaughn, B., & Foreign Affairs and Trade Division, D. (2007). Indonesia: Domestic politics, strategic dynamics, and American interests.
Vego, M. (2018). Maritime strategy and sea denial: Theory and practice. Routledge.
Waltz, K. N. (2010). Theory of international politics. Waveland Press.
Wibowo, E. B., Legionosuko, T., Mahroza, J., & Chandra Jaya, Y. (2020). Industry 4.0: challenges and opportunities in competency development for defense apparatus’ human resources. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(7), 45–60.
Wu, S. (2017). The development of Vietnam’s sea-denial strategy. Naval War College Review, 70(1), 143–161.
Copyright (c) 2025 Aris Sarjito
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Atribusi-Non Commercial-Share Alike (CC BY-NC-SA).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
